Samantha Larson
  • Clips
  • About
  • More Stories
  • In the Media
  • Contact

What Sasquatch Can Teach us About Science

6/16/2015

 
For Seattle Weekly. 

Sasquatch: mythical beast, elusive recluse, or something in between? The questions linger as fascination with the thought of wild humanoids living out their secretive lives just beyond our reach refuses to die—but even after all these decades of campfire debate across the globe, the question of Bigfoot’s existence is often left at that: all speculation, no rigor.


David George Gordon, Seattle-based author of the newly released Sasquatch Seeker’s Field Manual, thinks it’s high time we change the conversation. Doesn’t an idea so deliciously outlandish deserve equally exceptional examination? This is the question that Gordon brings to the table with his new book, which aims to arm the Bigfoot-curious with the power of citizen science.

There is no one better to lead the Sasquatch-seeking brigade. The author of 20 books about nature and the environment, Gordon has become somewhat of a specialist on topics that attract ideological intrigue, wavering doubt, and steadfast skepticism. His most popular book to date is The Eat-a-Bug Cookbook, with recipes to help you include things like spiders and crickets in your diet. While, understandably, your first reaction might be no way, Gordon, who sports a white beard and round spectacles, presents his quirky fixations with such a wholesome curiosity that they become irresistible. It can be hard to tell how seriously he takes any of it; his arguments are largely sensible, but all delivered with a playful gleam in the eye.

Does Gordon himself believe in Sasquatch? “I actually say I’m a fence-sitter. I’m not going to say there isn’t a Sasquatch—because people could find one tomorrow, and I’d be wrong,” he tells me. “But the bottom line is I wouldn’t go to court with any of the evidence people have gathered so far.”

Even the most compelling evidence—the 1967 footage from Bluff Creek, Calif., which portrays a large apish creature sauntering through the wilderness—is easy to poke holes in once you go looking for flaws. “There are lots of amazing stories out there,” Gordon says. “But what’s most interesting to me is the sort of fundamentals of science that aren’t lining up . . . I want to inspire people to be better field researchers.”

In his book, published by Mountaineers Books, Gordon first describes Sasquatch-related legends and lore from near and far. Then, should you find yourself inspired to go look for a Sasquatch, he outlines the principles of natural science for the layperson: tips for mounting a search (including the three basics—planning, persistence, and patience), for gathering evidence (from taking field notes to interpreting footprints), and for sharing your discoveries (“with other honest and ethical Sasquatch seekers in the hopes of collectively resolving the mystery of the Sasquatch once and for all”). The book’s last section provides recommendations of where to hike for the best chances of Sasquatchian scientific success.

Truth be told, however,whether or not you come home with irrefutable proof of Bigfoot’s existence is just a side note to Gordon’s main point. “What I’m really trying to get people into is systematic observation,” he says. More than a means to an end, to Gordon the search for Sasquatch is the end itself—a tool to get people outside and learn how to observe as a naturalist does. “If I wrote a book about a citizen science project looking at snails, for example—which is actually a subject I’m interested in as well—I don’t think it would have the same immediate appeal.”

Citizen science, Gordon writes in the book, “is a win-win proposition.”

“People get training in scientifically accepted techniques for collecting, sorting, and, sometimes, analyzing data. In return, they share their insights about observable phenomena—for example, the migratory patterns of wild birds or butterflies, or the waxing and waning of local amphibian populations—natural phenomena that may be happening, quite literally, in their own backyards.”

While Gordon hasn’t come across Sasquatch evidence himself, he knows quite a few people who have, and who hold firm in their Bigfoot beliefs. But “an extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof,” Gordon says, quoting Marcello Truzzi, a sociologist who studied skepticism. And, as audacious a thought that a Sasquatch could really be out there may be, Gordon thinks he’s got an equally audacious means of verification. “I maintain it will take no less than that—thousands of pairs of eyes and ears, collectively gathering and sharing information that can further our understanding and, ultimately, lead us to this mysterious mammal, if indeed that’s what it is.”

“If there are enough eyes and ears out there, we’ll figure it out,” Gordon tells me. But even if we don’t, the fun of the pursuit just might make getting out there worth it.


Comments are closed.
    Samantha's

    Archives

    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011

    Categories

    All
    Arts & Culture
    ATTN
    Climbing & Adventure
    Crosscut
    Earthfix
    FIX.com
    Generation Anthropocene
    Grist
    Health
    High Country News
    Jungles In Paris
    Mental_floss
    National Geographic Daily News
    News
    People
    RootsRated
    Santa Cruz Weekly
    Science & Environment
    Seattle Weekly
    Smithsonian.com
    Tech
    Travel

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Clips
  • About
  • More Stories
  • In the Media
  • Contact